• About Amy Welborn
  • Homeschooling
  • Travel
  • Lent
  • Sex & Gender

Charlotte was Both

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Got it!
St. Anthony »

So, Mad Men?

June 12, 2012 by Amy Welborn

What did you think?

I had intended to blog more regularly (as in weekly) on Mad Men, but …I didn’t, did I?  I had some drama of my own the last couple of months occupying me, it was the end of school and all that, plus my weekly phone deconstructing of the episode with my oldest son (who lives in Atlanta, works in entertainment, and begins those particular phone calls by insisting “That’s what the MONEY’S for!”) seemed to satisfy the “analyze the heck out of the show” urge within.

Oh, and I also rewatched a slew of Breaking Bad eps in the middle of it, and the obvious and bracing superiority of BB over MM gave me a slight case of the shrugs in regard to the latter.

So all can do is offer random thoughts, and wait for you all to chime in:

  • Mad Men is good.  It’s one of the best things on television these days, by far.  But it’s not a game-changer. It’s not like The Sopranos in that sense.   It’s no Breaking Bad. Weiner isn’t really doing anything brand new or groundbreaking in Mad Men thematically or even, when you take out the high-gloss period sheen, stylistically.  It’s a show about his fixations, but he does not seem to have the artistic chops or spiritual center to universalize it. At times it happens, but not as a whole.
  • I do think that the burning core of the series that got us rolling with it has been lost in the shuffle and in just too damn many plot points.  And that is: Advertising as an embodiment of the “American Dream” and the possibility (and even necessity?) of reinvention of the self  in attaining it – Dick Whitman/Don Draper being the embodiment of that embodiment.  It was deeper than a wanna-be Cheeverish portrait of the suburbs and critique of the Man in the Gray Flannel Suit that it threatened to be.  There were times when the show was both dark and lyrical in its pursuit of that idea.  But it’s gone now.  Gone, as I said, in too many plot points, and this season, a surfeit of anvils labeled “EPISODE THEME: 60’s SPIRITUAL CHANGE: CUE KRISHNAS” or ‘EPISODE THEME: DON GOES TO A STONES CONCERT, IS CLEARLY OUT OF PLACE.”
  • To me, the iconic scene from the series – one that made me gasp and think, this will be different –  was this one. 
 
But the promise of that off-kilter, weird, but deeply truthful take?  Have hardly ever seen it since that moment.  Too bad.
  • Weiner seems to enjoy highlight characters no one cares about (Betty and Meghan – although I don’t mind Meghan as much as some – must be the French-Canadian in me talking) – and getting rid of really interesting characters with depth and potential – Sal and Lane being standouts in that regard.  I still miss Sal, and I’m going to miss Lane a lot.  His  unabashed love of America and his potential within it provided, I think, a really interesting perspective on that theme of the nature of the “American Dream” and the possibility of personal reinvention.  Oh well.
  • I really liked the episode where Roger dropped dry, pithy quips. You know, that one.
  • My son and I were talking about this tonight, and we agreed that  no matter how far ahead Weiner jumps now, when we come back, the men are going to look like crap.  They’re going to be wearing bell-bottoms and paisley and wide ties and their hair’s going to be shaggy, some of them will have pathetic little beards, and it’ds going to be sad. 
  • The Pimping of Joan?  Believable or not?  The episode was, of course, a pretty effective distillation of the entire series: the transition from a misogynist, cold, subculture to…something else. (not sure what…we are talking about advertising here..) Even though I never could buy the partners agreeing to encourage Joan in that direction (or even her agreeing), I thought the thing came off masterfully – the audience’s awareness of Don’s awareness being played with – and the juxtaposition of Peggy’s departure? Really good.
  • The show is always at its best when it sticks with the office.  The dynamics there are illuminating enough – they can be stunning.
  • Ah, Peggy.  I’ve always felt that the series was really about Peggy, just as much as it’s about Don.  Of course it is.   With as many elements of the season that drove me crazy this year – I really would be okay with Betty moving to Arizona or…Singapore? – the Peggy plotlines never hit a wrong note. Never.  Weiner has her just right.  Even the plotline where she moves in with Abe.  Think of the ways that could have been handled – most probably, in someone else’s hands, as a groovy move forward with the times.  But that’s not the way it went down here. It was presented, in dramatic terms, in a very interesting, ambiguous way – from the honest expression of Peggy’s expectations – she thinks Abe is going to ask her to marry her, but he’s just asking her to move in with him, and she’s disappointed at that  – to her mother’s reaction – which is anger, but not a caricature of “Catholic anger” – in the midst of the situation, we look at Peggy, we look at Abe, we listen to Peggy’s mom, and we suspect…ummm…she might be right. 
  • More Peggy: she had to move on, and this was a brave, important move by Weiner.  Far more interesting than who’s sleeping with whom.  I loved the meeting of Don and Peggy in the movie theater in that last ep. So true to both of them.  And when she tells him about her impending trip related to her new account – especially in the context of Don’s throwing money in her face a few weeks ago and her disappointment about not being able to go to Paris – “I get to ride on a plane.”  I teared up.  It was so true to the character.  And when we last see Peggy, in her motel room in Richmond, with dogs humping outside her window, where she draws the curtain, stretches out on the bed with a drink and smiles – more teariness.  It’s crazy and shabby and it’s not Paris, but she’s doing the work she wants to do, she’s being recognized for it, and she’s where she wants to be – and she rode on a plane.  Love.
  • Clearly, the campaign Peggy’s working on  is for Virginia Slims.  From discussion thread on TWOP, I found this – a presentation made by the agency that came up with the Virginia Slims campaign the year after. It’s really fascinating.  It’s fascinating partly because of what it describes about the creative process, one which anyone who’s engaged in any kind of creative work is quite familiar with: you spend hours, days and weeks, coming up with garbage, but then the right idea strikes  – the right idea that is clearly superior and different from the nonsense you’ve come up with before, but, paradoxically, which you couldn’t have come up with except for the previous garbage..

…..that’s what the money’s for!

…also fascinating because it reveals a world in which cigarettes were actually advertised.  As much as a libertarian as I am, I’ll say that this is one thing I’m glad Our Government Masters  have banned – cigarette advertising.  Hate tobacco.  It killed my dad and, as his doctor indicated with a wave of his hand in meeting with me in the hospital two weeks before my dad died, “Everyone else on this floor.” 

 But that doesn’t mean I still don’t find the process of coming up with this Virginia Slims campaign fascinating – a campaignwhich I still remember, and the jingle to which I can still sing…you’ve got your own cigarette now, baby! You’ve come a long, long way!

  • There’s a lot more to say..and I’m sure you’ll say it…this is just a start.
  • But really…Breaking Bad is better. More focused, and with an intriguing and compelling moral core.  The show is about temptation, sin and its consequences. Period.
  • Cannot wait. 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Amy Welborn, Mad Men | 10 Comments

10 Responses

  1. on June 12, 2012 at 11:20 pm Leroy Huizenga (@LHuizenga)

    Thanks for this, Amy. I’ve been kinda bored with MM this season, though it was good to see Campbell get hit hard not once but twice. For me, I guess I’ll keep watching since I’m so invested but I’m really just waiting to see how it ends.

    One thought — maybe our ennui with the series is part of the point: advertising made late modernity/postmodernity a vacuous thing with vacuous people, and the series’ own vacuity is part of that.


    • on June 12, 2012 at 11:25 pm Amy Welborn

      You bring up a good point…we don’t see anyone really struggling with the *point* of what they are doing. It has happened in the series, here and there – Abe dismissed Peggy initially because she was in advertising, and Don’s issue with Lucky Strike was pertinent. But you would think that the next step – as the 60’s and the quest for meaning strikes – would be a questioning of the whole enterprise. By some at least. Roger – we can only hope!


  2. on June 13, 2012 at 6:30 am Jim

    Mad Men is stick figures to Breaking Bad’s 3D. I’m a recent convert to BB and it is riveting top to bottom. What TV could be…….


    • on June 13, 2012 at 8:25 pm Amy Welborn

      I mostly agree. To me, the not quite-right note is Skyler. How far are you? I really was not crazy about her storyline in Season 4.


  3. on June 13, 2012 at 5:29 pm Mimi

    I’ve just begun to watch it – I finished Season one last night and am one episode into season too, so I skimmed a lot of your comments as I didn’t want spoilers.
    Having said that, I find the costuming lush and the symbolism incredibly well done. The usage of “By the Waters of Babylon” at the end of one of the episodes in the first season was fantastic.
    I think that identity is (at least as far as I’ve gotten) the main theme of the show, and I agree that Peggy is in many ways the other main character.


  4. on June 13, 2012 at 9:40 pm Jayne MacDonald

    I don’t remember Skyler, who is s/he? I am a MM addict, but really appreciate the recommendation for Breaking Bad, I will check it out. Wanted to point out that Meghan struggled with the “point” to advertising, and she got out. Stan sometimes comments that it’s pointless, boring, and generally meaningly, but he’s a bit player. I agree that Peggy is co-star of Don, and I think her character development has been fantastic all 5 seasons. Love it!


    • on June 13, 2012 at 9:42 pm Amy Welborn

      Whoops – Skyler is Breaking Bad. That was in response to Jim. Sorry!

      I agree with what you say – that point came out…next to last episode? Or the one before that? Stan was very pointed in his criticism. It was refreshing and realistic. Because you know, not only in advertising, but in any job – people to wonder what the point of what they’re doing is, all the time!


  5. on June 14, 2012 at 3:47 am angeliconguyen

    Haven’t yet seen The Sporanos or Breaking Bad, but I really, really look forward to getting into both — especially Breaking Bad.

    As for Mad Men, I love it, and enjoyed this past season as much as any — though I do find the lyrical and strange moments you mention rarer in more recent seasons (especially Season 4) than in earlier ones. I miss them, too.

    What I enjoy most about the show is watching Don’s halting attempts to do right — to transform himself into a genuinely good person. I understand that Walter White has taken a steep slide to the dark side; and that Tony Soprano attempted a Draper-esque project of personal improvement from time to time, to no avail. Whether Don will have greater success at being a good man is what keeps me watching.

    This season, though Don did flirt with Joan during the Jaguar jaunt, and though he did commit adultery in his heart during a fever dream, I thought he might at least [and at last!] refrain from breaking the 6th Commandment outside his own mind. But that last shot of the finale… I call it ambiguous, but tending toward evil. What do you think?

    As someone whose workplace (a smallish law firm) feels a lot like Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce, I enjoy seeing a mirror held up to a slice of nature I recognize. The stakes feel high, even when serious physical violence is a very remote possibility (especially by TV standards); and the interplay of causes and effects between the characters’ home lives and work lives, or between the development of one character and another, is often well done and interesting to pick apart.

    I actually thought the plot thread with ex-copywriter Paul Kinsey joining the Hare Krishnas served the series’ theme of ‘the possibility (and even necessity?) of reinvention of the self in attaining [the American Dream]’ pretty neatly: Paul had tried to reinvent himself from failed adman to religious devotee. But his conversion palled, and we meet him in the middle of a new attempt at reinvention: from top-knotted Hare Krishna recruiter to television writer, Northern-California farmer, husband, and father. Certainly it wasn’t necessary to make Kinsey a Hare Krishna to tell that particular story, but I thought it was a clever way of showing (in a visual way, for a visual medium — cf. overweight Betty) just how radical a transformation he had attempted to make.


  6. on June 14, 2012 at 6:29 am Jim

    Both Skyler and her sister Marie are difficult characters to understand fully. It seems like the writers of Breaking Bad can’t decide which way they are going with them. At times Skyler seems so sharp and at others so obtuse.

    I just finished all four seasons in about 8 weeks, watching on Netflix and buying Season 4 on DVD. It’s mesmerizing TV.


  7. on June 14, 2012 at 2:37 pm suburbanbanshee

    But the Virginia Slims were a lie. There had already been plenty of brands of women’s cigarettes in the past — just not recently in the US.

    It’s like somebody pretending like TV was just invented yesterday.



Comments are closed.

  • It is what it is



    stories
    opinions
    observations
    photos.
    reviews



    Seeker Friendly.


  • Header Image

    Progreso, Mexico 2014

  • Coming in 2021


  • Fiction

    absence of war

    A short story about mothers, daughters, and why we believe what we say we believe…or not. 

    "amy welborn"

    Finalist for the J.F.Powers Short Story Award. Read on  Wattpad. 

    A novel

  • My daughter’s Etsy Shop

    Crafts & Vintage

    vintage lunchbox

     

     

  • My Son’s Writings

    His movie Blog

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 9,618 other followers

  • Hola.

    Amy Welborn
  • Follow Charlotte Was Both on Facebook. Get new posts in your newsfeed. Save wear and tear on the Internets.

    Follow Charlotte Was Both on Facebook. Get new posts in your newsfeed. Save wear and tear on the Internets.
  • In the past

  • Follow Charlotte was Both on WordPress.com
  • amywelborn.net

    amywelborn.org

  • Copyright Notice

    © Amy Welborn and Charlotte Was Both, 2007-2020  Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: