Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Madness of Men

Kids are out! Free time! Finished my taxes!  Time to blog!!!

I’ve watched most of the Mad Men premier twice.  I say “most of” because the second time around, I fast forwarded through EVERY STINKIN’ SECOND of Betty – got it? EVERY STINKIN’ SECOND.

Why couldn’t she have died of thyroid cancer last season?  This better have a huge payoff , Weiner, that’s all I can say, if I have to continue to suffer through your blindness regarding this character and this actress.

Mad Men is not the Best Show Ever.  That would be, er, Breaking Bad IMHO.  But it’s enjoyable and has flashes of insight.  Matthew Weiner doesn’t have the moral center, creatively speaking, that Vince Gilligan has (who has said outright that Breaking Bad is an exploration of the question of how one makes moral choices in a moral vacuum) – and so one can never be too sure if he’s serious about the moral dilemmas his characters thrash about in, or if it’s mostly for affect.

Which brings us to Dante.

Now Dante, mind you, is about to be Hot.  Not only were his the first words out of Don Draper’s mouth (via voiceover) in this season opener, but our very favorite, Dan Brown, takes him on in his next novel.  So it might be time to brush up on your Divine Comedy.

Here’s the thing to remember, though.  Notwithstanding what you might think, given Don Draper was reading Dante on a Hawaiian beach, contemplating (we can assume) his essential solitude (a contemplation calling back to the last line of the previous season, in which Don was asked, leadingly, Are you alone? by a girl at a bar.  The answer is obviously, existentially, yes) - oh, yes – well, in Dante, the lowest level of hell, the spot where Satan resides alone (yes), is cold. He is frozen in his solitude.  Isolated, frozen and immobile. 

The great drama of The Sopranos was the agonized journey with Tony Soprano to…that diner.  Along the way, the viewer wondered if Tony would ever be able to break free of whatever bound him.  Weiner, who learned his craft on that show, has put us on the same journey with Don Draper and, in fact, almost everyone else on the show, each of whom is equally misguided, either endlessly running after false and ultimately pleasure or failing to recognize the gift of the present moment.  

Leaving the focus on Don, it has become a bit tiresome, as no woman can find him resistible, apparently.  He is not exactly changing with the times. He has no clue what is popular  with The Kids, his ad pitches are getting tired and repetitive, and his personal life is just one big cycle of exploitation.

Midway through our life’s journey I went astray from the straight road and awoke to find myself alone in a dark wood.

He’s in the middle of his life, alone.  What’s the end point of his journey?  Is it going to be that frozen place, or will there be a way out?  Will he ever reach any sense of self-awareness?

And this – aside from the burning mystery of what all these people are going to look like as the 60′s creep on and fashion gets more execrable with every approaching bell-bottom, striped trouser and (eventually) leisure suit  – is what keeps me watching.

I wonder, too, if Weiner is going to really play out the advertising theme – if he is going to give any of his floundering characters a chance to connect their floundering to the extraordinary superficiality of their chosen careers.  The advertising has often been used as a means of exploring human yearning, since this is what marketing and advertising are all about: identifying what you really want and then manipulating you into wanting something shiny as a replacement.  Last season, Stan, one of the creatives, said something about how ridiculous their efforts were and one day they’d wake up and realize what they were sacrificing, “and all for ….Heinz beans.”

That’s the line I keep thinking about, wondering if any of that insight will bear fruit.

Death, of course, is all around Mad Men.   Near-death began this episode, and Don is both haunted by recent deaths and fascinated by a new acquaintance – a cardiac physician – who has great power over life and death, a reality that fascinates Don to the point at which he evidently wishes he could be this doctor – to the point of sleeping with his wife.

His wife being a Catholic, who gave him the Dante he read on the beach and to whom he says at the end of this episode that began with him, with Dante, alone on that journey, “I want to stop doing this.”

Time – and many scenes featuring witticisms uttered by men in ever-growing sideburns – will tell.

*********

Don’s proposed ad campaign for the Royal Hawaiian (who had bankrolled his fact-finding trip) is the place where it begins to come together.  His campaign suggests Hawaii as a “jumping off point” – a place where the old self is left behind.  Everyone else at the table is a little aghast because the image reminds them of suicide – specifically of James Mason’s suicide in A Star is Born.  Don defends himself, saying their reaction is unique and not at all what the general public would see – and even as he says this, we wonder what’s at work in his subconscious, as weighted as it is, not only by identity issues, but also by two suicides for which he could be seen to be partially responsible.  No, no, he says, it’s a “jumping off point” in the sense that it’s a place in which a person becomes completely one with the surroundings.  But then he implicitly acknowledges the objections in another fascinating line in answer to an accusation of morbidity.  Well, he says: “Heaven is a little morbid. How do you get to heaven? Something terrible has to happen”

*************

Roger Sterling is dealing with death, as well, of course, and to him belongs the most striking line of the episode.  Roger’s mother dies, and in processing this with his therapist, Roger says, “I used to jump off mountains and it never occurred to me I had this invisible parachute. My mother loved me in some completely pointless way and now it’s gone.”

Not to get too theological on it all, but really, how can I not?  True love is “pointless”  - in that it is not utilitarian.  It is the love we learn from the beginning from human beings and that hopefully points us to Love that is so paradoxically pointless and essential.  There is no reason for us to be here, yet here we are.  To see the pointlessness can be a grace-filled shock that reveals, of course, the point.

Because they didn’t think what he was doing was immoral.

Embarrassing, maybe.  Awkward, certainly.

But immoral or wrong?

Nope.

Can I be any more direct?

No agonized columns necessary.  They basically have no problem with it.

This isn’t a new thing.

Look back through the centuries.

In every era, in ever culture, you can catch a glimpse:  Children exposed, abandoned and outright murdered.  Mostly because they were 1) female 2)disabled or 3)chosen to be scapegoats for the imagined needs of the tribe or race.

There really is no such thing as “progress.’  Child sacrifice still happens, every day, down the street.

And I don’t care how educated you are or how sophisticated you fancy yourself.  If you think shooting a baby in the head is kind of gross, but being paid to snip its spine or suck it out of a uterus for a fee is defensible, moral, not newsworthy or none of your business, your views are not new or radical at all.  First of all, you’re not consistent, and secondly, you’re more old school and reactionary than you think, defending what patricians, high priests and eugenicists have defended forever:

Sacrificing the defenseless so you can stay strong.

Be honest.  For once.

So yeah

So yeah, I haven’t blogged in a while.  Mostly because I don’t care much about blogging and also because the blogging universe drives me batty.

So really, the most accurate way of expressing it all is via Tumblr Gif Talk.

So here ya go:

So Pope Benedict resigned and I was like all:

THEN I was like all:

And then Pope Francis was elected and I was like:

Although seriously, I knew he was ordained after Ye Old V2 and seemed casual about liturgy so I admit that I was a little wary and a little like:

Why? Because even though I’m a post V2 baby and I attend Ye Old Novus Ordo…well..

..I was liking where B16 was taking us on this.

But let’s just say that one of the last times I went to Mass, the priest said, “Since I can’t think of anything witty to say, I guess I’ll just say the closing prayer.”

SHUTUP. 

Okay.  When that lame kind of stuff goes down, I just try to think:

Yeah. Me neither.

 

So…just..

But please don’t give these guys any hint that that is okay. Pope. Please. Mkay?

And then I go to another Mass and it’s all chant-y and no one messes around or makes stuff up as they go and I’m like:

And I’m thinkin’….should I blog on all of this? Because it’s pretty metaphorical and stuff.

Nah.  Too much else to do.  Homeschooling and sh**.

But then the hits just keep on coming.  The implication that we’re in a “fresh new era” and that it’s *all* so much better now, without mozettas and crap.  Even from bishops! Talkin’ about the Refreshing Fresh Air and Fresh New Tone of Freshness.  Not to speak of the Refreshing Simplicity of the Fresh New Simple Tone. So I’m all:

And trying to hold it in.  Especially when people are all intense about the new Pope, who is great, (I think), but they’re all:

And they’re all like: ERMYGAWD ITHINKIMSUPPOSEDTOHELPTHEPOORBECAUSEPOPEFRANCIS  and I’m all like:

And:

Did you NEVER read a freakin’ GOSPEL before March 13?

But…

…then it’s like Sunday night, April 7 at 8pm central, so I’m like:

Later, Gator!

(Yes…a tease of a title)

I had (sort of and totally unreasonably) high hopes that what  used to be the most awesome element of a papal coronation (as it was called) would be restored by Pope Francis.

It’s the part in which, as the Pope is being carried in on the sedia, he stops three times, a bunch of quick burning flax is lit, burns and disappears, while Sancte Pater, sic transit gloria mundi!” is chanted.

(Translation:  Holy Father, thus passes the glory of the world.)

My hopes were especially high when I read that Pope Francis was bringing in friars from La Verna for the ceremony – La Verna being the spot where Francis received the stigmata.  I was under the impression that in the past, it was a Franciscan who had performed this role in the ceremony, so the possibility of a La Verna friar doing this in 2013 didn’t seem far-fetched. It would seem to fit his sense of discipleship and ministry.

Well, it was far-fetched, apparently.  Of course it didn’t happen.  Besides, as I learned later, it wasn’t necessarily a Franciscan who would do this, but just one of the Masters of Ceremonies.

Below is a clip from John XXIII’s coronation.  You can hear the sic transit chants at about 4.20;5.20 and 6:50. You can see the moment the last two times, only hear it the first.

The whole thing is quite fascinating. (Well, the “whole thing” is a few dozen parts long on YouTube, and I’ve not watched it all, but the parts I have interest me for a number of reasons, one of them being the genial hubub of the ceremony. Watch the Kyrie clip to get a taste.  No regimental stiffness. Ministers in fairly constant instructional conversation, much wandering.  The strength of confidence of the Pope’s voice is striking as well.)

Yes, that part of the ceremony is rooted in the centuries when the pope was monarch of more than a few square kilometers, and perhaps needed the reminder more than they do now.  But still.  Even with that changing historical context, it would still be fitting. And awesome.

So now, a couple of points:

Two comments – this and this comment at Catholic Answers were in understanding where Pope Francis, as a religious, might be coming from in terms of liturgy.  I was especially appreciative of this explanation of Pope Francis not preaching from the chair, which I admit, bothers me.  I mean - cathedra  - bishop – teaching – authority – pretty ancient and important.  I don’t know if this is true – perhaps someone can confirm.

It was also important to notice that he did not use the cathedra to preach. This is also a very Jesuit custom. Jesuit bishops (the few that there are) do not use the cathedra, because it’s a royal symbol. St. Ignatius banned all forms of the regal from the Jesuit order.

Being a religious myself, I know how much it is drummed into our heads to avoid all of these things, to the point that they make us feel very uncomfortable. Think about it this way. It takes 10 years to become a solemnly professed male religious. That’s the reason that there are so few communities in solemn vows. Most make simple vows. The formation is shorter. During the 10 years, the idea of simplicity and shunning anything that makes you look like a secular priest is drummed into you to the point that you have to push yourself, when you do have to accommodate. This may take some time for him or he may never do it. We’ll just have to wait it out. The good part is that he is not being liturgically sloppy. He’s just being a religious.

(Well, we can say…not a Benedictine kind of religious, either.)

I am still not sure how this works out – what takes precedence.  We’ll see.

And for Holy Thursday, such welcome news that Pope Francis has enlisted the Diocese of Rome and the San’Egidio community to bring 3000 of Rome’s poor to Mass - I am presuming at St. John Lateran, where this Mass is celebrated.  Bringing it all together – the people of God praying together in and through beauty and truth.

Update:

Confusing but now clarified-  Pope Francis will celebrate the Chrism Mass at St. Peter’s in the AM , and then the Mass of the Lord’s Supper at the Marmo prison in the evening, and wash the feet of prisoners there.  Both Pope Benedict XVI also celebrated Mass at this prison – the Fourth Sunday of Lent 2007 – and Pope John Paul II visited. 

And…A 2011 piece on Popes in Prisons - a survey of papal visits to prisons, written on the eve of Benedict XVI’s second visit to a prison as Pope.  The John XXIII story is particularly interesting.  Here’s a video of Benedict XVI’s 2011 visit to Rebbibia Prison (very moving) and the text of his Q & A with prisoners.   It’s all rather…you know…pastoral. )

All of you.

Because this is Catholic. Which means  - this is Jesus, who loves us, saves us and who lives in each one of us.  This is Catholic.  Which means – this is who we love.

Please.

Pray away your agenda.  Now. And just love.

From my comments: 

Pope Benedict is as precious to me as my own grandfather. I love what one commenter correctly described as his gentle scholarliness, and I love the humility and love for God that float invisibly around him like a mantle. No, he wasn’t perfect. Yes, he should have managed the Curia better. And, yes, I fully expect Pope Francis to be just as holy a pope as Benedict was – but also to make just as many mistakes, albeit likely different ones. Don’t we all? As a relatively new Catholic, though, I have to say that all the harsh injustice that is being leveled at Benedict in the form of comparisons with Francis is the most painful, heartbreaking thing I have experienced since entering the Church. 

And from today: 

Jesus. Everywhere. Jesus. 

St. Joseph’s Day

St. Joseph

 

Quite a few people at noon Mass at the Cathedral.  There are always more during Lent, but this crowd seemed even larger than usual.  Maybe close to two hundred? All ages, including not a few children. (Homeschoolers, plus it’s spring break in these parts)

Every statue covered except for St. Joseph.  Altar overflowing with food, and many bags for those in need spread on the floor. St. Joseph’s altar (or table) blessed during Mass using the Litany of St. Joseph.

Papal bunting adorning the door.

A Mass with music that including chant – some Latin, some English – and some of the propers.

People scramble and search for some secret to “revitalize” Catholic parish life.  Books, articles, blog posts and conferences grapple with the question.  Some of the answers are good.  But the best begin with what’s already here.  In this case, as I’ve said before, the “original small group” – daily Mass – bound together by the presence of Christ, animated by the Spirit to deeper faith, hope and charity….

Ite ad Joseph

"st. joseph"

This one interests me because it predates the large oratory’s construction.

stjoseph

"st. Joseph"

At the shrine featured in the vintage holy cards.  Summer 2011. 

And remember…it’s a Solemnity…which means that for day..it’s like it’s not Lent! Feast away!

%d bloggers like this: